What each bill does, in plain language. Both sides of the debate where there has been one.
Parliament, filtered through what you care about
Take a short values survey and Demos shows you the bills and petitions that touch what you care about.
A free account lets you record where you stand, see how your MP voted, email them about it, and get a summary of what matches you — daily, weekly, monthly, or not at all.
Updates rules and paperwork requirements across dozens of federal laws — covering farming, food safety, environment, transport, and trade — to reduce administrative burden and allow more use of electronic systems.
What it means for you
Farmers, businesses, and regulators would deal with less paperwork and fewer outdated rules, making it easier and cheaper to comply with federal regulations.
EconomicSocialGovernanceEnvironmental
The debate · 3 points
Supporters say
The bill would cut red tape so Canadians spend less time on paperwork, with clearer and more efficient rules and regulations.
Fewer barriers and faster government services would help Canadian businesses compete and grow in a changing global economy.
The bill would reduce red tape in agriculture by amending the Fertilizers Act, the Seeds Act, and the Feeds Act, addressing long-standing concerns from farming communities.
Requires the CPP Investment Board's investment policies to bar investments in any entity with reasons to believe it has committed human, labour or environmental rights violations, produced prohibited munitions, or directed certain corruption offences.
What it means for you
Canadians with CPP savings could see their pension fund exclude companies accused of human rights, labour, environmental or corruption violations. Whether this affects returns depends on how the board applies the test.
EconomicSocialGovernanceEnvironmental
No debate summary yet — we'll add the for/against once this bill is debated.
This is a wide-ranging omnibus bill touching many different policies important to Canadians. Included among these, it speeds up government approvals for major infrastructure and energy projects, strengthens supply chain laws, updates labour rules, and modernizes trade document processes.
What it means for you
Big construction and energy projects could get approved faster, goods could move more efficiently across Canada, and workers in federally regulated industries could see changes to collective bargaining rights. Read the deep analysis for more details.
Modernizing port governance would add marine expertise to port boards, set clearer performance measures, and require fee transparency. Industry groups say a transport agency should be able to overturn unjustified port fees, which would support trade and competitiveness.
A 'one project, one review' approach would cut approval delays, give investors more certainty, and help major energy, mining and infrastructure projects get built faster, creating jobs.
The bill would strengthen worker protections against wage theft and misclassification, protect workers when contracts change hands, help new unions reach a first agreement, and speed up grievance arbitration. It would also give bargaining parties more time and earlier access to dispute-resolution tools, while keeping the right to strike.
Critics say
Changes to section 107 of the Canada Labour Code would let the minister end legal strikes and lockouts. Critics say this weakens the right to strike and collective bargaining. Some labour groups want clearer limits on intervention and an independent mediator.
Opponents argue the bill weakens environmental protections and favours fossil fuel projects such as pipelines, while clean electricity receives far less public money. Some scientists warn of lasting environmental harm.
Critics say the bill weakens consultation with Indigenous peoples and puts their rights at risk. Some ask why human rights provisions were removed, and warn that broad executive powers come with limited independent oversight.
This bill requires the federal government to create a national strategy to end 'energy poverty' — the inability to afford adequate heating, cooling, and electricity — with targets, reporting to Parliament, and an advisory council.
What it means for you
Low-income Canadians, seniors, renters, and people in northern or remote communities who struggle to pay energy bills could eventually benefit from new federal programs focused on affordable energy and home efficiency upgrades.
A national strategy would create federal accountability for addressing energy poverty.
The federal government can collect and analyze data and set thresholds, so it can direct time and resources where they will have the greatest impact.
Improving home energy efficiency, such as furnaces and boilers, reduces energy use even when that energy comes from fossil fuels. The Canada Greener Homes Affordability Program is a positive step in this direction.
